"logico-" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_text": "logic + -o-",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "prefix",
        "head": "",
        "sort": ""
      },
      "expansion": "logico-",
      "name": "head"
    },
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "logico-",
      "name": "en-prefix"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "prefix",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages using catfix",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2000 June, Nicholas Rescher, “Optimalism and Axiological Metaphysics”, in The Review of Metaphysics, LIII, № 4, § iii, page 815:",
          "text": "Yet what is to be the status of a law of optimality to the effect that “whatever possibility is for the best is ipso facto the possibility that is actualized.” It is certainly not a logico-conceptually necessary truth; from the angle of theoretical logic it has to be seen as a contingent fact — albeit one not about nature as such, but rather one about the manifold of real possibility that underlies it. Insofar as it is necessary at all it obtains as a matter of ontological rather than logico-conceptual necessity, while the realm of possibility as a whole is presumably constituted by considerations of logico-metaphysical necessity alone.¹⁴\n¹⁴ The operative perspective envisions a threefold order of necessity/possibility: the logico-conceptual, the ontological or proto-physical, and the physical.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "logic and —, logical and —, logically and —"
      ],
      "id": "en-logico--en-prefix-z7tTI3jx",
      "links": [
        [
          "logic",
          "logic#English"
        ],
        [
          "logical",
          "logical#English"
        ],
        [
          "logically",
          "logically#English"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "morpheme"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sounds": [
    {
      "ipa": "/ˈlɒd͡ʒɪkəʊ/",
      "tags": [
        "UK"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "logico-"
}

{
  "etymology_text": "logic + -o-",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "prefix",
        "head": "",
        "sort": ""
      },
      "expansion": "logico-",
      "name": "head"
    },
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "logico-",
      "name": "en-prefix"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "prefix",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English prefixes",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages using catfix",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "Quotation templates to be cleaned"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2000 June, Nicholas Rescher, “Optimalism and Axiological Metaphysics”, in The Review of Metaphysics, LIII, № 4, § iii, page 815:",
          "text": "Yet what is to be the status of a law of optimality to the effect that “whatever possibility is for the best is ipso facto the possibility that is actualized.” It is certainly not a logico-conceptually necessary truth; from the angle of theoretical logic it has to be seen as a contingent fact — albeit one not about nature as such, but rather one about the manifold of real possibility that underlies it. Insofar as it is necessary at all it obtains as a matter of ontological rather than logico-conceptual necessity, while the realm of possibility as a whole is presumably constituted by considerations of logico-metaphysical necessity alone.¹⁴\n¹⁴ The operative perspective envisions a threefold order of necessity/possibility: the logico-conceptual, the ontological or proto-physical, and the physical.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "logic and —, logical and —, logically and —"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "logic",
          "logic#English"
        ],
        [
          "logical",
          "logical#English"
        ],
        [
          "logically",
          "logically#English"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "morpheme"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sounds": [
    {
      "ipa": "/ˈlɒd͡ʒɪkəʊ/",
      "tags": [
        "UK"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "logico-"
}