"jurisprudentially" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "jurisprudential",
        "3": "ly"
      },
      "expansion": "jurisprudential + -ly",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From jurisprudential + -ly.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "jurisprudentially (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adv"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ly",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2007 June 28, Linda Greenhouse, “Even in Agreement, Scalia Puts Roberts to Lash”, in New York Times:",
          "text": "Justice Scalia was clearly taking aim at the chief justice, openly mocking his much publicized goal of lowering the court’s temperature through unanimous and jurisprudentially modest decisions.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "In terms of jurisprudence."
      ],
      "id": "en-jurisprudentially-en-adv-6P34VVda",
      "links": [
        [
          "jurisprudence",
          "jurisprudence"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "jurisprudentially"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "jurisprudential",
        "3": "ly"
      },
      "expansion": "jurisprudential + -ly",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From jurisprudential + -ly.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "jurisprudentially (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adv"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adverbs",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -ly",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adverbs",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2007 June 28, Linda Greenhouse, “Even in Agreement, Scalia Puts Roberts to Lash”, in New York Times:",
          "text": "Justice Scalia was clearly taking aim at the chief justice, openly mocking his much publicized goal of lowering the court’s temperature through unanimous and jurisprudentially modest decisions.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "In terms of jurisprudence."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "jurisprudence",
          "jurisprudence"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "jurisprudentially"
}