"ametaphysical" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "a",
        "3": "metaphysical"
      },
      "expansion": "a- + metaphysical",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "a- + metaphysical",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "ametaphysical (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with a-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "derived": [
        {
          "word": "ametaphysicality"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2009 January 27, Hartry Field, “Epistemology without metaphysics”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 143, number 2, →DOI, pages 249–290",
          "text": "The task as I see it is to lay out how such a notion might work, and to try to argue that most of ordinary practice (though not all the practice of normative realist philosophers) could survive using just such an ametaphysical notion of justification.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not metaphysical"
      ],
      "id": "en-ametaphysical-en-adj-XEX5vHXW",
      "links": [
        [
          "metaphysical",
          "metaphysical"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "nonmetaphysical"
        },
        {
          "word": "unmetaphysical"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "ametaphysical"
}

{
  "derived": [
    {
      "word": "ametaphysicality"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "a",
        "3": "metaphysical"
      },
      "expansion": "a- + metaphysical",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "a- + metaphysical",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "ametaphysical (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with a-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2009 January 27, Hartry Field, “Epistemology without metaphysics”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 143, number 2, →DOI, pages 249–290",
          "text": "The task as I see it is to lay out how such a notion might work, and to try to argue that most of ordinary practice (though not all the practice of normative realist philosophers) could survive using just such an ametaphysical notion of justification.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not metaphysical"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "metaphysical",
          "metaphysical"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "nonmetaphysical"
    },
    {
      "word": "unmetaphysical"
    }
  ],
  "word": "ametaphysical"
}