"alphabeticalness" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "alphabetical",
        "3": "ness"
      },
      "expansion": "alphabetical + -ness",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "alphabetical + -ness",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "alphabeticalness (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ness",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1868, Chaucer Society (London, England), Publications, page 95",
          "text": "The ABC's alphabeticalness doubtless had some attraction for Chaucer, independent of its subject.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1976, Open Letter",
          "text": "The alphabeticalness is important because it's simple and because the words a poet writes are things made of alphabet elements where vowels are the sounding spaces.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2017 December 4, Arne Zettersten, Viggo Hjornager Pedersen, Symposium on Lexicography VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Lexicography May 5–6, 1994 at the University of Copenhagen, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, page 192",
          "text": "There seems to be even a fourth reason for not adhering to strict alphabeticalness: 9.4. Keep combinations that are closely related in meaning together by entering them in the entry for the first element Thus, e.g. the OALD says in[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The state of being alphabetical."
      ],
      "id": "en-alphabeticalness-en-noun-en:alphabeticalness",
      "links": [
        [
          "alphabetical",
          "alphabetical"
        ]
      ],
      "senseid": [
        "en:alphabeticalness"
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "alphabeticality"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "translations": [
        {
          "code": "pl",
          "lang": "Polish",
          "sense": "Translations",
          "tags": [
            "feminine",
            "rare"
          ],
          "word": "abecadłowość"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "alphabeticalness"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "alphabetical",
        "3": "ness"
      },
      "expansion": "alphabetical + -ness",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "alphabetical + -ness",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "alphabeticalness (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms suffixed with -ness",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Translation table header lacks gloss"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1868, Chaucer Society (London, England), Publications, page 95",
          "text": "The ABC's alphabeticalness doubtless had some attraction for Chaucer, independent of its subject.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1976, Open Letter",
          "text": "The alphabeticalness is important because it's simple and because the words a poet writes are things made of alphabet elements where vowels are the sounding spaces.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2017 December 4, Arne Zettersten, Viggo Hjornager Pedersen, Symposium on Lexicography VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Lexicography May 5–6, 1994 at the University of Copenhagen, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, page 192",
          "text": "There seems to be even a fourth reason for not adhering to strict alphabeticalness: 9.4. Keep combinations that are closely related in meaning together by entering them in the entry for the first element Thus, e.g. the OALD says in[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The state of being alphabetical."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "alphabetical",
          "alphabetical"
        ]
      ],
      "senseid": [
        "en:alphabeticalness"
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "alphabeticality"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "translations": [
    {
      "code": "pl",
      "lang": "Polish",
      "sense": "Translations",
      "tags": [
        "feminine",
        "rare"
      ],
      "word": "abecadłowość"
    }
  ],
  "word": "alphabeticalness"
}