See Repucrat on Wiktionary
Download JSON data for Repucrat meaning in All languages combined (4.1kB)
{
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "Republican",
"3": "Democrat"
},
"expansion": "Blend of Republican + Democrat",
"name": "blend"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Blend of Republican + Democrat.",
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "-"
},
"expansion": "Repucrat (not comparable)",
"name": "en-adj"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "adj",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "topical",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "US politics",
"orig": "en:US politics",
"parents": [
"Politics",
"United States",
"Society",
"North America",
"All topics",
"America",
"Fundamental",
"Earth",
"Nature"
],
"source": "w"
},
{
"_dis": "48 52",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English blends",
"parents": [],
"source": "w+disamb"
},
{
"_dis": "48 52",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
"parents": [
"Entries with incorrect language header",
"Entry maintenance"
],
"source": "w+disamb"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1996 August 14, Giovanni 8, “Voodoo versus Greenspan: wont work”, in alt.politics.libertarian (Usenet)",
"text": "Correct. I believe I introduced the error. As SC wrote, though,\nthe Repucrat majority in the Senate was not a very large one, and\nthey did not have a majority in the House, whence spending bills\noriginate.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Republican while espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"id": "en-Repucrat-en-adj-ysyf4lG4",
"links": [
[
"Republican",
"Republican"
],
[
"Democratic",
"Democratic"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(US politics) Republican while espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"tags": [
"US",
"not-comparable"
],
"topics": [
"government",
"politics"
]
}
],
"word": "Repucrat"
}
{
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "Republican",
"3": "Democrat"
},
"expansion": "Blend of Republican + Democrat",
"name": "blend"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Blend of Republican + Democrat.",
"forms": [
{
"form": "Repucrats",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "Repucrat (plural Repucrats)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "topical",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "US politics",
"orig": "en:US politics",
"parents": [
"Politics",
"United States",
"Society",
"North America",
"All topics",
"America",
"Fundamental",
"Earth",
"Nature"
],
"source": "w"
},
{
"_dis": "48 52",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English blends",
"parents": [],
"source": "w+disamb"
},
{
"_dis": "48 52",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
"parents": [
"Entries with incorrect language header",
"Entry maintenance"
],
"source": "w+disamb"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1994 November 7, John G. Otto, “Clean Up Your Act”, in alt.radio.networks.npr (Usenet)",
"text": "But hearing Daniel \"Mush Mouth\" Schorr whine\nabout the awful terrible negative campaigning by the Repucrats after hearing\nyour darling radical leftist Lawton Chiles' slime campaign is enough to\nmake nearly any one sick.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2002 September 1, Sean Carroll, “[OT] Attack Iraq? Yea or Nay?”, in alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise (Usenet)",
"text": "It's where I live, too. And yes, I am. And I did so when Clinton was\npresident, and I will continue to do so when whatever Demoblican or\nRepucrat who is next succeeds Bush.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2003 August 5, redclay, “Radio Daze”, in alt.politics.bush (Usenet)",
"text": "Bloomberg is not a Republican; he is a repucrat. Recall that Bloomberg was\na demolican until they said they did not want him as the mayoral candidate\nfor New York city.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2004 September 4, wer...@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu, “Arnie and the socialists”, in soc.culture.german (Usenet)",
"text": "Repucrat or Demoblican, there's not a whole lot of difference...",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"A Republican person espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"id": "en-Repucrat-en-noun-IhVorkDY",
"links": [
[
"Republican",
"Republican"
],
[
"Democratic",
"Democratic"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(US politics) A Republican person espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"related": [
{
"word": "Demoblican"
}
],
"tags": [
"US"
],
"topics": [
"government",
"politics"
]
}
],
"word": "Repucrat"
}
{
"categories": [
"English adjectives",
"English blends",
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English lemmas",
"English nouns",
"English uncomparable adjectives"
],
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "Republican",
"3": "Democrat"
},
"expansion": "Blend of Republican + Democrat",
"name": "blend"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Blend of Republican + Democrat.",
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "-"
},
"expansion": "Repucrat (not comparable)",
"name": "en-adj"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "adj",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations",
"en:US politics"
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1996 August 14, Giovanni 8, “Voodoo versus Greenspan: wont work”, in alt.politics.libertarian (Usenet)",
"text": "Correct. I believe I introduced the error. As SC wrote, though,\nthe Repucrat majority in the Senate was not a very large one, and\nthey did not have a majority in the House, whence spending bills\noriginate.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Republican while espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"links": [
[
"Republican",
"Republican"
],
[
"Democratic",
"Democratic"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(US politics) Republican while espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"tags": [
"US",
"not-comparable"
],
"topics": [
"government",
"politics"
]
}
],
"word": "Repucrat"
}
{
"categories": [
"English adjectives",
"English blends",
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English lemmas",
"English nouns",
"English uncomparable adjectives"
],
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "Republican",
"3": "Democrat"
},
"expansion": "Blend of Republican + Democrat",
"name": "blend"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Blend of Republican + Democrat.",
"forms": [
{
"form": "Repucrats",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "Repucrat (plural Repucrats)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"related": [
{
"word": "Demoblican"
}
],
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations",
"en:US politics"
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1994 November 7, John G. Otto, “Clean Up Your Act”, in alt.radio.networks.npr (Usenet)",
"text": "But hearing Daniel \"Mush Mouth\" Schorr whine\nabout the awful terrible negative campaigning by the Repucrats after hearing\nyour darling radical leftist Lawton Chiles' slime campaign is enough to\nmake nearly any one sick.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2002 September 1, Sean Carroll, “[OT] Attack Iraq? Yea or Nay?”, in alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise (Usenet)",
"text": "It's where I live, too. And yes, I am. And I did so when Clinton was\npresident, and I will continue to do so when whatever Demoblican or\nRepucrat who is next succeeds Bush.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2003 August 5, redclay, “Radio Daze”, in alt.politics.bush (Usenet)",
"text": "Bloomberg is not a Republican; he is a repucrat. Recall that Bloomberg was\na demolican until they said they did not want him as the mayoral candidate\nfor New York city.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2004 September 4, wer...@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu, “Arnie and the socialists”, in soc.culture.german (Usenet)",
"text": "Repucrat or Demoblican, there's not a whole lot of difference...",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"A Republican person espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"links": [
[
"Republican",
"Republican"
],
[
"Democratic",
"Democratic"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(US politics) A Republican person espousing typically Democratic positions."
],
"tags": [
"US"
],
"topics": [
"government",
"politics"
]
}
],
"word": "Repucrat"
}
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable All languages combined dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-06-04 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-05-02 using wiktextract (e9e0a99 and db5a844). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.