"Refucklican" meaning in All languages combined

See Refucklican on Wiktionary

Noun [English]

Forms: Refucklicans [plural]
Etymology: Blend of Republican + fuck. Etymology templates: {{blend|en|Republican|fuck}} Blend of Republican + fuck Head templates: {{en-noun}} Refucklican (plural Refucklicans)
  1. (US politics, Internet slang, derogatory, vulgar) A Republican. Tags: Internet, US, derogatory, vulgar Categories (topical): People, US politics Synonyms: Republicant, Republicunt, RepubliKKKan, Republiklan, Retardican, Rethuglican

Inflected forms

Download JSON data for Refucklican meaning in All languages combined (3.2kB)

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "Republican",
        "3": "fuck"
      },
      "expansion": "Blend of Republican + fuck",
      "name": "blend"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Blend of Republican + fuck.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "Refucklicans",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Refucklican (plural Refucklicans)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "antonyms": [
        {
          "word": "commiecrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Democrap"
        },
        {
          "word": "Democreep"
        },
        {
          "word": "Democunt"
        },
        {
          "word": "DemoKKKrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Demoncrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Dhimmicrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Homocrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Nazicrat"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English blends",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with topic categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "People",
          "orig": "en:People",
          "parents": [
            "Human",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "US politics",
          "orig": "en:US politics",
          "parents": [
            "Politics",
            "United States",
            "Society",
            "North America",
            "All topics",
            "America",
            "Fundamental",
            "Earth",
            "Nature"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2003 June 16, Crazyalec, “The lies that led us into war ...”, in alt.atheism (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "The bigger problem was not Refucklicans.It was arab oil control.You always have to kiss arab ass because of oil.why do you think Middle East conflict still going on?",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2003 July 2, Hello Man, “Toward One-Party Rule”, in alt.politics.usa.republican (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "Refucklicans won't be able to disenfranchise enough blacks to cover how much they're going to lose by this time.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2004 May 1, msl...@aol.com, “Re: How far will the GOP go to win? How dirty will they GO?”, in alt.politics.liberalism (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "Not...its the Refucklicans that are doing that. It goes on on Fux News daily.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2007 August 6, Peacenik, “Why did Clinton ignore Bin Laden?”, in alt.politics.bush (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "Clinton attacked bin Laden in 1998, and wanted to fight against al-Qaeda then. But the Refucklicans whined about him \"wagging the dog\" and didn't give him any support in his anti-terrorism efforts.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A Republican."
      ],
      "id": "en-Refucklican-en-noun-hmEzzeyU",
      "links": [
        [
          "Internet",
          "Internet"
        ],
        [
          "slang",
          "slang"
        ],
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "Republican",
          "Republican"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(US politics, Internet slang, derogatory, vulgar) A Republican."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "Republicant"
        },
        {
          "word": "Republicunt"
        },
        {
          "word": "RepubliKKKan"
        },
        {
          "word": "Republiklan"
        },
        {
          "word": "Retardican"
        },
        {
          "word": "Rethuglican"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "Internet",
        "US",
        "derogatory",
        "vulgar"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "government",
        "politics"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Refucklican"
}
{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "Republican",
        "3": "fuck"
      },
      "expansion": "Blend of Republican + fuck",
      "name": "blend"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Blend of Republican + fuck.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "Refucklicans",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Refucklican (plural Refucklicans)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "antonyms": [
        {
          "word": "commiecrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Democrap"
        },
        {
          "word": "Democreep"
        },
        {
          "word": "Democunt"
        },
        {
          "word": "DemoKKKrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Demoncrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Dhimmicrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Homocrat"
        },
        {
          "word": "Nazicrat"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        "English blends",
        "English countable nouns",
        "English derogatory terms",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
        "English internet slang",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English vulgarities",
        "en:People",
        "en:US politics"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2003 June 16, Crazyalec, “The lies that led us into war ...”, in alt.atheism (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "The bigger problem was not Refucklicans.It was arab oil control.You always have to kiss arab ass because of oil.why do you think Middle East conflict still going on?",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2003 July 2, Hello Man, “Toward One-Party Rule”, in alt.politics.usa.republican (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "Refucklicans won't be able to disenfranchise enough blacks to cover how much they're going to lose by this time.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2004 May 1, msl...@aol.com, “Re: How far will the GOP go to win? How dirty will they GO?”, in alt.politics.liberalism (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "Not...its the Refucklicans that are doing that. It goes on on Fux News daily.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2007 August 6, Peacenik, “Why did Clinton ignore Bin Laden?”, in alt.politics.bush (Usenet), retrieved 2022-04-30",
          "text": "Clinton attacked bin Laden in 1998, and wanted to fight against al-Qaeda then. But the Refucklicans whined about him \"wagging the dog\" and didn't give him any support in his anti-terrorism efforts.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A Republican."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "Internet",
          "Internet"
        ],
        [
          "slang",
          "slang"
        ],
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "Republican",
          "Republican"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(US politics, Internet slang, derogatory, vulgar) A Republican."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "Republicant"
        },
        {
          "word": "Republicunt"
        },
        {
          "word": "RepubliKKKan"
        },
        {
          "word": "Republiklan"
        },
        {
          "word": "Retardican"
        },
        {
          "word": "Rethuglican"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "Internet",
        "US",
        "derogatory",
        "vulgar"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "government",
        "politics"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Refucklican"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable All languages combined dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-25 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-05-02 using wiktextract (bb24e0f and c7ea76d). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.