"OCRable" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "OCR",
        "3": "-able"
      },
      "expansion": "OCR + -able",
      "name": "suf"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From OCR + -able.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "OCRable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -able",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2008 June, Ross L. Kodner, “Why I Still Hate Scanners”, in GPSolo Magazine, volume 25, number 4, page 36:",
          "text": "Finally, there's the expectation gap between what we think is OCRable and what can actually can be OCR'd. I can't tell you how many times I've talked to someone who has said, \"When I try and scan this thing, all I get is garbage. How come?\"—and the document in question is a preprinted state-specific divorce financial disclosure form replete with boxes and lines galore.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Able to be accurately scanned by OCR (optical character recognition)."
      ],
      "id": "en-OCRable-en-adj-XchY9mIQ",
      "links": [
        [
          "OCR",
          "OCR#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "optical character recognition",
          "optical character recognition#Noun"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "OCRable"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "OCR",
        "3": "-able"
      },
      "expansion": "OCR + -able",
      "name": "suf"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From OCR + -able.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "OCRable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -able",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2008 June, Ross L. Kodner, “Why I Still Hate Scanners”, in GPSolo Magazine, volume 25, number 4, page 36:",
          "text": "Finally, there's the expectation gap between what we think is OCRable and what can actually can be OCR'd. I can't tell you how many times I've talked to someone who has said, \"When I try and scan this thing, all I get is garbage. How come?\"—and the document in question is a preprinted state-specific divorce financial disclosure form replete with boxes and lines galore.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Able to be accurately scanned by OCR (optical character recognition)."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "OCR",
          "OCR#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "optical character recognition",
          "optical character recognition#Noun"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "OCRable"
}