"C++er" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "C++",
        "3": "er",
        "id2": "occupation"
      },
      "expansion": "C++ + -er",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From C++ + -er.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "C++ers",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "C++er (plural C++ers)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -er (occupation)",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1992, Paul DiLascia, Windows++: Writing Reusable Windows Code in C++, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, →ISBN, page 24:",
          "text": "Non C++-ers have probably noticed the strange-looking WPPoint& return type declaration for all those overloaded operators: / WPPoint& operator++() { ++x; ++y; return *this;} / WPPoint& operator--() { --x; --y; return *this;} / Huh? What’s & doing there?",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1993, Object Magazine, volume 3, COOT, Incorporated, page 28:",
          "text": "Smalltalkers will thus gleefully make ad hominum^([sic]) attacks by noting the folly of large C++ projects (“Small is beautiful” is the appropriate rallying cry), but C++ers will often counter by pointing out the lack of disciplined development by some Smalltalkers.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1999, Chris Corry, The Waite Group’s COM/DCOM Primer Plus, Sams Publishing, →ISBN, page 142:",
          "text": "However, for the majority of C++ers, who either didn’t care or were more concerned with building programs than fighting holy wars, MFC hit a chord.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2004, John Deacon, Object-Oriented Analysis and Design: A Pragmatic Approach, Addison-Wesley, →ISBN, pages 318 and 333:",
          "text": "C++ers will have to mentally pronounce interface as “pABC” (some say “pabs”; some say “pea eh bee sea”). […] And that means, given the findings of the last decade or so, that object-oriented C++ers will not usually be interested in private inheritance. […] And C++ers say member function rather than method.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2004, David West, Object Thinking, Microsoft Press, →ISBN, page 37:",
          "text": "Disagreement between Smalltalkers and C++ers gains added interest from the fact that both claim to be the direct heirs of another, older, language, SIMULA.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2005, C/C++ Users Journal, page 46:",
          "text": "This discussion was prompted by an e-mail exchange with Bartosz Milewski, C++er, Seattleite, and chef extraordinaire (I kid you not; Bartosz cooked the best meal I’ve ever eaten, and I’ve been places).",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "One who uses the C++ programming language."
      ],
      "id": "en-C++er-en-noun-kfpqeUMG",
      "links": [
        [
          "C++",
          "C++"
        ],
        [
          "programming language",
          "programming language"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "C++'er"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "C++er"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "C++",
        "3": "er",
        "id2": "occupation"
      },
      "expansion": "C++ + -er",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From C++ + -er.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "C++ers",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "C++er (plural C++ers)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms spelled with +",
        "English terms suffixed with -er (occupation)",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1992, Paul DiLascia, Windows++: Writing Reusable Windows Code in C++, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, →ISBN, page 24:",
          "text": "Non C++-ers have probably noticed the strange-looking WPPoint& return type declaration for all those overloaded operators: / WPPoint& operator++() { ++x; ++y; return *this;} / WPPoint& operator--() { --x; --y; return *this;} / Huh? What’s & doing there?",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1993, Object Magazine, volume 3, COOT, Incorporated, page 28:",
          "text": "Smalltalkers will thus gleefully make ad hominum^([sic]) attacks by noting the folly of large C++ projects (“Small is beautiful” is the appropriate rallying cry), but C++ers will often counter by pointing out the lack of disciplined development by some Smalltalkers.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1999, Chris Corry, The Waite Group’s COM/DCOM Primer Plus, Sams Publishing, →ISBN, page 142:",
          "text": "However, for the majority of C++ers, who either didn’t care or were more concerned with building programs than fighting holy wars, MFC hit a chord.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2004, John Deacon, Object-Oriented Analysis and Design: A Pragmatic Approach, Addison-Wesley, →ISBN, pages 318 and 333:",
          "text": "C++ers will have to mentally pronounce interface as “pABC” (some say “pabs”; some say “pea eh bee sea”). […] And that means, given the findings of the last decade or so, that object-oriented C++ers will not usually be interested in private inheritance. […] And C++ers say member function rather than method.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2004, David West, Object Thinking, Microsoft Press, →ISBN, page 37:",
          "text": "Disagreement between Smalltalkers and C++ers gains added interest from the fact that both claim to be the direct heirs of another, older, language, SIMULA.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2005, C/C++ Users Journal, page 46:",
          "text": "This discussion was prompted by an e-mail exchange with Bartosz Milewski, C++er, Seattleite, and chef extraordinaire (I kid you not; Bartosz cooked the best meal I’ve ever eaten, and I’ve been places).",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "One who uses the C++ programming language."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "C++",
          "C++"
        ],
        [
          "programming language",
          "programming language"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "C++'er"
    }
  ],
  "word": "C++er"
}