"ɸeruti" meaning in Proto-Celtic

See ɸeruti in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Adverb

Etymology: From Proto-Indo-European *péruti. The form and history of this term is subject to controversy due to providing major difficulties in the traditional theory of the rise of the absolute and conjunct inflection in Old Irish. The traditional theory requires an early apocope of the final *-i that appeared in multiple Celtic personal endings, especially the third-person endings *-ti and *-nti that was blocked by a supposed transphonologized enclitic particle. The apocopated verbal forms are assumed by the theory to become Old Irish conjunct forms, while the encliticized forms became absolute forms. *ɸeruti is a major counterexample to the apocope rule the theory relies on, since the palatalization of the Old Irish descendant uraid indicates a word-final *-i remaining in an identical position to the verb-final *-i whose apocope is sought. Schrijver and McCone, supporters of the traditional theory, attempt to eliminate this counterexample by deriving this adverb from an accusative *ɸerutam, creating an accusative with no fellow Indo-European parallel, citing what appears to be the accusative definite article being always being prefixed before uraid in Old Irish. Kortlandt rejects extrapolating the accusative beyond Old Irish due to other Indo-European descendants of *peruti having long been fossilized, viewing such a defossilization of a clearly fossilized adverb as an unlikely development. Later on, Matasović joined Kortlandt in rejecting it for semantic reasons, believing that a locative with *-i was more semantically appropriate for an expression of time. Etymology templates: {{inh|cel-pro|ine-pro|*péruti}} Proto-Indo-European *péruti Head templates: {{head|cel-pro|adverb}} *ɸeruti
  1. last year Wikipedia link: Brill Publishers Tags: reconstruction Synonyms: ɸerutam
    Sense id: en-ɸeruti-cel-pro-adv-J5O0kYXj Categories (other): Proto-Celtic entries with incorrect language header

Download JSON data for ɸeruti meaning in Proto-Celtic (2.7kB)

{
  "descendants": [
    {
      "depth": 1,
      "templates": [
        {
          "args": {
            "1": "sga",
            "2": "uraid"
          },
          "expansion": "Old Irish: uraid, urid\nMiddle Irish: uraid\nIrish: anuraidh\nManx: nurree\nScottish Gaelic: an-uiridh",
          "name": "desctree"
        }
      ],
      "text": "Old Irish: uraid, urid\nMiddle Irish: uraid\nIrish: anuraidh\nManx: nurree\nScottish Gaelic: an-uiridh"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "cel-pro",
        "2": "ine-pro",
        "3": "*péruti"
      },
      "expansion": "Proto-Indo-European *péruti",
      "name": "inh"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Proto-Indo-European *péruti.\nThe form and history of this term is subject to controversy due to providing major difficulties in the traditional theory of the rise of the absolute and conjunct inflection in Old Irish. The traditional theory requires an early apocope of the final *-i that appeared in multiple Celtic personal endings, especially the third-person endings *-ti and *-nti that was blocked by a supposed transphonologized enclitic particle. The apocopated verbal forms are assumed by the theory to become Old Irish conjunct forms, while the encliticized forms became absolute forms. *ɸeruti is a major counterexample to the apocope rule the theory relies on, since the palatalization of the Old Irish descendant uraid indicates a word-final *-i remaining in an identical position to the verb-final *-i whose apocope is sought.\nSchrijver and McCone, supporters of the traditional theory, attempt to eliminate this counterexample by deriving this adverb from an accusative *ɸerutam, creating an accusative with no fellow Indo-European parallel, citing what appears to be the accusative definite article being always being prefixed before uraid in Old Irish. Kortlandt rejects extrapolating the accusative beyond Old Irish due to other Indo-European descendants of *peruti having long been fossilized, viewing such a defossilization of a clearly fossilized adverb as an unlikely development. Later on, Matasović joined Kortlandt in rejecting it for semantic reasons, believing that a locative with *-i was more semantically appropriate for an expression of time.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "cel-pro",
        "2": "adverb"
      },
      "expansion": "*ɸeruti",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "Proto-Celtic",
  "lang_code": "cel-pro",
  "original_title": "Reconstruction:Proto-Celtic/ɸeruti",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Proto-Celtic entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "last year"
      ],
      "id": "en-ɸeruti-cel-pro-adv-J5O0kYXj",
      "links": [
        [
          "last year",
          "last year"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "ɸerutam"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "reconstruction"
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "Brill Publishers"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "ɸeruti"
}
{
  "descendants": [
    {
      "depth": 1,
      "templates": [
        {
          "args": {
            "1": "sga",
            "2": "uraid"
          },
          "expansion": "Old Irish: uraid, urid\nMiddle Irish: uraid\nIrish: anuraidh\nManx: nurree\nScottish Gaelic: an-uiridh",
          "name": "desctree"
        }
      ],
      "text": "Old Irish: uraid, urid\nMiddle Irish: uraid\nIrish: anuraidh\nManx: nurree\nScottish Gaelic: an-uiridh"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "cel-pro",
        "2": "ine-pro",
        "3": "*péruti"
      },
      "expansion": "Proto-Indo-European *péruti",
      "name": "inh"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Proto-Indo-European *péruti.\nThe form and history of this term is subject to controversy due to providing major difficulties in the traditional theory of the rise of the absolute and conjunct inflection in Old Irish. The traditional theory requires an early apocope of the final *-i that appeared in multiple Celtic personal endings, especially the third-person endings *-ti and *-nti that was blocked by a supposed transphonologized enclitic particle. The apocopated verbal forms are assumed by the theory to become Old Irish conjunct forms, while the encliticized forms became absolute forms. *ɸeruti is a major counterexample to the apocope rule the theory relies on, since the palatalization of the Old Irish descendant uraid indicates a word-final *-i remaining in an identical position to the verb-final *-i whose apocope is sought.\nSchrijver and McCone, supporters of the traditional theory, attempt to eliminate this counterexample by deriving this adverb from an accusative *ɸerutam, creating an accusative with no fellow Indo-European parallel, citing what appears to be the accusative definite article being always being prefixed before uraid in Old Irish. Kortlandt rejects extrapolating the accusative beyond Old Irish due to other Indo-European descendants of *peruti having long been fossilized, viewing such a defossilization of a clearly fossilized adverb as an unlikely development. Later on, Matasović joined Kortlandt in rejecting it for semantic reasons, believing that a locative with *-i was more semantically appropriate for an expression of time.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "cel-pro",
        "2": "adverb"
      },
      "expansion": "*ɸeruti",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "Proto-Celtic",
  "lang_code": "cel-pro",
  "original_title": "Reconstruction:Proto-Celtic/ɸeruti",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "Proto-Celtic adverbs",
        "Proto-Celtic entries with incorrect language header",
        "Proto-Celtic lemmas",
        "Proto-Celtic terms derived from Proto-Indo-European",
        "Proto-Celtic terms inherited from Proto-Indo-European"
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "last year"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "last year",
          "last year"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "reconstruction"
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "Brill Publishers"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "ɸerutam"
    }
  ],
  "word": "ɸeruti"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable Proto-Celtic dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-24 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-05-02 using wiktextract (46b31b8 and c7ea76d). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.